Thought Leadership
Thought Leadership
Business Incentives Consulting
Best Practices
Accelerating Your Recovery with Negotiated Incentives, an article by Michael Press, Appearing in the November/December 2010 Issue of The Leader magazine.
(Click here for full Article)
Business Incentives Consulting
Project Portfolio CO.
As a result of consolidations, our client's portfolio company is planning to add about 100 positions to their current headcount in KY of approximately 125. Combined with other of their portfolio companies in KY, this PE's operations are responsible for a total of 1270 direct jobs. The study we produced for them shows that their operations contribute:
? a total of 2,700 permanent full-time jobs; [these can be normal round bullets as shown]
? more than $700 million in Gross State Product to the KY economy;
? and nearly $20 million annually in state and local government tax revenues;
through the action of economic multiplier effects.

With facts such as these as the backdrop, my Firm, the PE and its PC successfully negotiated for a package of incentives that will exceed $45,000 per new position on a NPV basis. The package contains Cash Grants, Electricity Discounts and tax credits and exemptions. Taken together, the package far exceeds the $6,000 per position the portfolio company was awarded 6 years ago as a stand-alone. The Government Affairs director at the PE holding company level is credited with this $4.5 million in incremental ROI. We are moving on to do the same thing in other states where the portfolio companies contribute significant economic activity and are contemplating additional capital investment.

To my knowledge, this is the first time a PE concern has utilized its portfolios? combined strength to exponentially raise the per unit value of state and local government incentives.
Business Incentives Consulting
Best Practices in Negotiating Incentives
Remarks given by Michael R. Press in February, 2009 at the first U.S. Conference on Grants, Tax Credits and Other Business Incentives.

Each significant capital project or relocation of a major business activity can be broken into its "Life Cycle Stages". Each cycle stage can be associated with a set of "best practices" whose implementation will ensure that maximum value is realized by the Company in return for its investment in the community.
 
Case Study:  Boeing HQ Relocation Process, Harvard Business Review, October 1, 2001
(Click here for full Article)
 
Chief Administrative Officer of The Boeing Company, John Warner describes the process of selecting the Company’s new World Headquarters city from a short list of candidates. He talks about the protracted timeframe he faced and the benefits of working with highly experienced outside consultants since he could not afford for anyone to be “learning on the job”.
10 commandments to Unlocking the Full Value of Business Incentives
 
1. Know what to ask for
 
2. Keep it competitive.
 
3. Estimate the benefits to the community that will flow from your project in the way of tax receipts and jobs. Then, present these estimates in an effective manner to relevant government officials.
 
4. Adopt a strict internal protocol regarding external communication about the project.
 
5. Favorable tax rulings should be at the top of the list.
 
6. Look for incentives that are cost-free to government.
 
7. Do not accept the first offer or the "standard" package.
 
8. Job commitments should be conservative.
 
9. Be prepared to accept a deluge of paperwork for compliance and public scrutiny of project parameters
 
10. Check and comply with lobbying Statutes and Regulations.
Economic Development Incentives in a Down Economy
Click here for a copy of the full article
 
This article appears in and is reproduced with the permission of the Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives, Vol. 18, No. 3, June 2008. Published by Warren, Gorham & Lamont, an imprint of Thomson Reuters. Copyright © 2008 Thomson/TTA. All rights reserved.

SPECIAL REPORT
 
Economic Development Incentives in a Down Economy
 
Even a company in a steady or capacity-reduction mode can benefit from tax and nontax incentives, which, as an added benefit, may be eligible for IRC Section 118 income exclusion as a contribution to capital.
 
       Author: MICHAEL R. PRESS, JEROME M. SCHWARTZMAN, GREGORY C. BURKART,
       MEEGAN LALLY SPICER, AND ERIC GEISLER
 
DEPARTMENT EDITOR AMY EISENSTADT
 
The concept of tax incentives for economic development is typically associated strictly and narrowly with increased headcount and major new business facilities. But these conditions will apply to only a handful of companies when the general economy is flat or contracting. Tax departments in corporate America have much to gain by maintaining a focus on taking advantage of incentives opportunities even in difficult economic conditions, because hundreds of programs offer strong financial incentives for retaining jobs and maintaining economic activity.
 
 
     Two things are inherently true about business incentives in a down economy:
 
• Businesses have a need for the free cash flow that incentives can provide.
 
• Financial incentives are not as readily available to businesses during difficult economic periods because many programs are restricted to projects that add jobs and productivity to the state's economy.
   A strategy that maximizes the value derived from incentives in recessionary times should do at
   least two things:
 
1. Look for tax credits and other financial incentives at the state and local levels that may be offered for "retention" of existing jobs, as opposed to new job creation. We looked at current programs in the 48 contiguous states, and found tax and other financial incentives available in at least 25 states that do not require companies to expand their headcount on a statewide basis.
 

2. Look for refunds of taxes paid when profits were higher and the company may not have been as diligent in uncovering every potential saving opportunity. One such benefit most commonly missed involves IRC Section 118 ("contributions to the capital of a corporation") at the federal level. In one recent situation, a Fortune 100 manufacturer could save $2 million in cash by deferring federal tax through the application of Section 118 to a local tax incentive that was negotiated more than a year ago.

BENCHMARKING DATA for INCENTIVE DEALS:


How Did Your Company Perform in Securing Economic Development Incentives Compared to Your Competitors

By Michael R. Press

A new source of comprehensive incentive benchmarking data has become available from Incentives Consulting Associates (ICA) a strategic partner of M. R. Press Consulting, with headquarters in the Netherlands. ICA tracks and collects incentive data from North America and Europe where economic development incentives are most prevalent. They monitor more than 30,000 public sources of information on a daily basis--for more information please visit: http://www.icaincentives.com.

Although the new database is still under development in terms of depth of coverage by geography, it is the best source available today for benchmarking data on economic development incentives awarded by state and local governments in the U.S.

Measuring Incentives Success One Job at at Time
The database makes cross-company comparisons of popular statistics such as dollars-per-job, and ROI from incentives quite easy. For the first time, we are able to measure success and compare how well or poorly the companies that have taken advantage of economic development incentives have fared on a per job basis. Looking back at 2010 and the first quarter of 2011 who do we see at the top of the list? Not surprisingly, the 2 packages that exceeded $1 million per new job consisted of an auto-maker in Michigan and a new battery technology investment in Ohio. Also not surprisingly, they both had sizable “job retention” components. Chrysler Group committed to retaining 20,000 jobs in the State, while adding 900 in Sterling Heights Michigan in return for a package of incentives that will total $1.3 billion over 20 years. BASF received a $24.6m grant from the Department of Energy (DOE) under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The company is using it in Elyria, Ohio to construct a facility that will produce advanced cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries that will power the hybrid and full-electric vehicles of the near future. The project is expected to create 20 jobs and retain 134 positions. 

Grading Corporate Performance With Benchmarking Data
If we were to grade the performance of companies participating in these programs, we would consider the highest achievers as those who were either awarded in excess of $45,000 per new position, or returned more than 90% of the associated capital investment. Those companies would be graded an “A”. There were 176 companies earning a Grade of A. Companies that met both criteria taking the greatest advantage of the incentive opportunity received an “A+” for their efforts. There were only nine of these awarded in the United States:

Grade Company State
A+ Chrysler Group Michigan
A+ Remington Arms Kentucky
A+ Explorys Ohio
A+ Ford Motor Company Michigan
A+ Intrasphere Technologies New Jersey
A+ Procter & Gamble (P&G) Ohio
A+ Hilliard Farber & Company New Jersey
A+ Remington Arms New York
A+ UQM Technologies Colorado









 

 

     > A grade of “B” was awarded to the 174 companies achieving between $20,000 and 45,000 per new position.

     > A grade of “C” was awarded to 467 companies who achieved at least $5,000 but less than $20,000 per new position.

     > Below $5,000 per position we would have to rank as a failing grade, or “F”. There were 473 contracts in this group.

Is your company taking advantage of the economic incentives available? If so, how do its results stack up against your competitors in our benchmark list below? More importantly, get help raising your “grade” in 2011 by the professionals with the most experience in North America www.mrpressconsulting.com or call us for a free consultation 203-255-9397.

See which companies made the grade... and which did not -- in the full article. 

 

 

 

 
Featured Case Study

Project Food Prep Co is a manufacturing relocation and expansion in Kentucky bringing 100 new positions. The company will prepare and deliver Fresh/Flash Frozen Organic Meals, Organic Breads-Pastries, Mixes and Baby Foods nationwide. The project will acquire a facility of more than 25,000 square feet into which a fully functional kitchen, bakery, training, office and warehouse distribution facility will be installed.Incentives package totaling more than $1.3 million includes:

• Refundable Income Tax Credits
• Sales Tax Refund
• Training Grants
• Property Tax Exemptions
Grants and Tax Incentives Consulting
BENCHMARKING DATA for INCENTIVE DEALS:
How Did Your Company Perform in Securing Economic Development Incentives Compared to Your Competitors?
By Michael R. Press
A new source of comprehensive incentive benchmarking data has become available from Incentives Consulting Associates (ICA) a strategic partner of M. R. Press Consulting, with headquarters in the Netherlands. ICA tracks and collects incentive data from North America and Europe where economic development incentives are most prevalent. They monitor more than 30,000 public sources of information on a daily basis--for more information please visit: http://www.icaincentives.com

To Read the entire article, click here  click here.

Respond to Economic Crisis with economic development incentives that instantly improve financial strength. All facilities whose outputs will change (grow or shrink) significantly as a result of rationalization of capacity, should be analyzed for government-sponsored grants and tax incentives.